Hollandazed: Thoughts, Ideas, and Miscellany — game development

OP FIRE (by Tom Russell)

Mary Russell

Comments 3 Tags game design, game development

OP FIRE (by Tom Russell)

I don't play a lot of tactical games; it's just not my jam. Occasionally someone will ask me to explain why it's not my jam, and there are several reasons, sure. Even the simplest tactical games are still a little too complex for my taste. I'm also not a big fan of turns that take twenty minutes to play but represent five minutes on the ground. And then there's a tendency for the hexes to get overly congested: I have a stacking limit of two units per hex, but one or both of those units can be a vehicle which...


THREE WAYS TO EVALUATE A DESIGN (by Tom Russell)

Mary Russell

Tags game design, game development, game publishing

THREE WAYS TO EVALUATE A DESIGN (by Tom Russell)

When we evaluate a design submission, the first thing we do is take a look at the rules to get a sense of the thing. If it captures our interest, we then proceed to getting the game on the table. I don't have hard numbers on this, but I'd hazard a guess that only about a third of the submissions that we turn down get to that second step. If we've taken the time to print up a copy of the game, or to ask the designer to go to the expense of sending us a playtest kit, then we...


DESIGNING THE SHOT & SHELL BATTLE SERIES (by Tom Russell)

Mary Russell

Comments 3 Tags game design, game development

DESIGNING THE SHOT & SHELL BATTLE SERIES (by Tom Russell)

In 2010, I began designing my first-ever wargame. It was something I did as a lark; as a sailor might say in salty language, "for ships and giggles". I was a Very Serious Eurogame Designer who was going to have a Very Serious, Prestigious, and Profitable Career designing mid-weight Euros. Just to be eclectic though I thought it'd be fun to do a wargame now and then on the side, and perhaps a nerdy train game. Of course, the way things panned out, I couldn't sell the Euros. The wargames sold, as did the nerdy train games, and so here...


THE PROBLEM OF STATELESSNESS IN SOLITAIRE GAMES (by Tom Russell)

Mary Russell

Tags game design, game development, solitaire

THE PROBLEM OF STATELESSNESS IN SOLITAIRE GAMES (by Tom Russell)

I used to be very wary of solitaire wargames. Not, mind you, of playing two-player wargames solitaire, but of honest-to-gosh solitaire designs. Partially, my reticence was somewhat aspirational: I might be playing both sides in this WW2 game, but the possibility existed that someday, someone who would dig the game would be sitting on the other side of the table. Whereas if I plunked down some of my hard-earned cash for a solo-only title, that possibility - however rarified and improbable - no longer existed. And, when you're on the sort of budget where you can only buy maybe five...


CHARLEMAGNE SESSION REPORT (by Tom Russell)

CHARLEMAGNE SESSION REPORT (by Tom Russell)

I almost won today.  Like Agricola, Master of Britain, Charlemagne, Master of Europe (CMOE for short) requires that players hit a certain VP threshold to progress to the next turn. CMOE is a longer game, and there are more opportunities to score VP, and so as you'd expect the VP thresholds are higher. To win Agricola, you needed 75 VP at the end of the game. By contrast, in CMOE 75 VP is a turn threshold slightly over half-way through the game; the final threshold, at the end of Turn 12, is 135 VP. Which is doable. I know it's...